Australian Building Industries Pty Ltd v Stramit Corp Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 1318

Australian Building Industries Pty Ltd v Stramit Corp Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 1318

The evidence did not exclude the possibility that representations alleged by ABI were made or a contract entered into; the material did not establish there was no real question to be tried, and the difficulties faced by ABI did not render its case untenable, hopeless, or futile. Summary dismissal was not justified at this stage.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 1997
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Summary Dismissal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['summary Dismissal' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'accessory Liability' 'trade Practices Act S 52']
['practice and Procedure' 'contract Law' 'trade Practices'] ['summary Dismissal' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'accessory Liability' 'trade Practices Act S 52']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Summary Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the proceeding should have been summarily dismissed under O 20 subr 2 (1) (b) and (c) of the Federal Court Rules' 'Whether there was a real question to be tried regarding oral representations and contract' 'Whether misleading and deceptive conduct occurred under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Whether the failure to plead lack of intention or belief or absence of reasonable grounds prevented applicant’s claim under s 51A of the Trade Practices Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence did not exclude the possibility that representations alleged by ABI were made or a contract entered into; the material did not establish there was no real question to be tried, and the difficulties faced by ABI did not render its case untenable, hopeless, or futile. Summary dismissal was not justified at this stage.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Appeal allowed' 'Orders of the trial Judge made on 1 August 1997 in proceeding QG 70 of 1997 set aside' 'Respondents’ motion brought by notice of motion filed 27 June 1997 dismissed' "Respondents to pay applicant's costs of that motion" "Respondents to pay appellant's costs of the appeal"]