Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference [2002] HCA 16
Where litigation between parties has been finally resolved by a federal court within jurisdiction, and all parties to the decision are content to abide by it, persons who were not parties to the proceedings (even if they appeared as amici curiae) cannot institute proceedings in the original jurisdiction of the High Court seeking orders of certiorari to quash the decision for alleged legal error, because such a claim does not give rise to a 'matter' under Ch III of the Constitution. There is no immediate right, duty or liability to be established, and to grant relief would subvert the finality of litigation and the stability of rights determined by judicial power. Even had a 'matter' been...
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Catholic Bishops Conference & Anor; Applicant: Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia ex rel Australian Episcopal Conference of the Roman Catholic Church; Second Respondent: John McBain; First Respondent: Sundberg J
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Original Jurisdiction Applications for Writs of Certiorari / Final Orders by High Court After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Power of the Commonwealth, Certiorari, Certiorari for Non Jurisdictional Error, Matter Under Ch III, Standing, Attorney General Relator Proceedings, Jurisdiction of the High Court, Exercise of Discretion, Inconsistency of Laws (s 109)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Catholic Bishops Conference & Anor
Applicant
Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia ex rel Australian Episcopal Conference of the Roman Catholic Church
Applicant
John McBain
Second Respondent
Sundberg J
First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Original Jurisdiction Applications for Writs of Certiorari / Final Orders by High Court After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, who were not parties to the Federal Court proceedings, could obtain writs of certiorari to quash a Federal Court judgment for non-jurisdictional error of law on the face of the record
- 2 Whether the claims raised a 'matter' under Ch III of the Constitution to engage the original jurisdiction of the High Court
- 3 Whether certiorari is available against a judge of a federal superior court in respect of non-jurisdictional error of law
Ratio Decidendi
Where litigation between parties has been finally resolved by a federal court within jurisdiction, and all parties to the decision are content to abide by it, persons who were not parties to the proceedings (even if they appeared as amici curiae) cannot institute proceedings in the original jurisdiction of the High Court seeking orders of certiorari to quash the decision for alleged legal error, because such a claim does not give rise to a 'matter' under Ch III of the Constitution. There is no immediate right, duty or liability to be established, and to grant relief would subvert the finality of litigation and the stability of rights determined by judicial power. Even had a 'matter' been...
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Applications dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment