Australian Communications and Media Authority v Mobilegate Ltd A Company Incorporated in Hong Kong (No 9) [2010] FCA 1383

Australian Communications and Media Authority v Mobilegate Ltd A Company Incorporated in Hong Kong (No 9) [2010] FCA 1383

A pecuniary penalty of $2 million is appropriate for Mr Phillips’ accessorial involvement in contraventions of the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) over 54 days, given the deliberate, profit-driven, systematic deception for commercial gain, lack of remorse or mitigation, and need for deterrence; declaratory and injunctive relief are justified to record disapproval, vindicate the Authority, and protect the community.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty, Declaratory and Injunctive Orders After Liability Judgment
Outcome
Declarations, injunctions, $2 million pecuniary penalty and costs against the eighth respondent, as detailed in orders.
Legal Topics
['spam Act Contraventions' 'commercial Electronic Messages' 'deceptive Conduct' 'accessorial Liability' 'penalties' 'injunctions' 'declaratory Relief']
['communications Law' 'trade Practices' 'consumer Protection'] ['spam Act Contraventions' 'commercial Electronic Messages' 'deceptive Conduct' 'accessorial Liability' 'penalties' 'injunctions' 'declaratory Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Penalty Proceeding / Penalty, Declaratory and Injunctive Orders After Liability Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate penalty for accessorial liability under Spam Act 2003 (Cth)' 'Whether to grant declaratory and injunctive relief for contraventions of Spam Act 2003 (Cth) and Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

A pecuniary penalty of $2 million is appropriate for Mr Phillips’ accessorial involvement in contraventions of the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) over 54 days, given the deliberate, profit-driven, systematic deception for commercial gain, lack of remorse or mitigation, and need for deterrence; declaratory and injunctive relief are justified to record disapproval, vindicate the Authority, and protect the community.

Court Disposition

Declarations, injunctions, $2 million pecuniary penalty and costs against the eighth respondent, as detailed in orders.

Orders

  • ['Declarations that the eighth respondent aided, abetted and was knowingly concerned in contraventions of Spam Act 2003 (Cth) and Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by IMP (now deregistered) and Jobspy.' 'Eighth respondent (Scott Gregory Phillips) restrained for 7 years from various conduct relating to fake profiles,...