Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1034
The respondents, by entering into deeds and by giving effect to their provisions, engaged in conduct that had the substantial purpose of substantially lessening, preventing or hindering competition in relevant retail liquor markets, in contravention of s 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); and certain provisions constituted exclusionary provisions falling foul of s 4D and s 45.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment; Orders and Directions Pending Penalty Hearing
- Outcome
- Declarations made against the respondents for contraventions of s 45 of the Trade Practices Act; penalty and relief hearing adjourned; costs awarded to applicant; orders and directions given.
- Legal Topics
- ['anticompetitive Conduct' 'exclusionary Provisions' 'retail Liquor Markets' 'trade Practices Act S 45']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment; Orders and Directions Pending Penalty Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondents engaged in conduct that substantially lessened, prevented or hindered competition in retail liquor markets' 'Whether exclusionary provisions within deeds contravened section 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents, by entering into deeds and by giving effect to their provisions, engaged in conduct that had the substantial purpose of substantially lessening, preventing or hindering competition in relevant retail liquor markets, in contravention of s 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); and certain provisions constituted exclusionary provisions falling foul of s 4D and s 45.
Court Disposition
Declarations made against the respondents for contraventions of s 45 of the Trade Practices Act; penalty and relief hearing adjourned; costs awarded to applicant; orders and directions given.
Orders
- ['Declaration that respondents contravened s 45(2)(a)(ii), s 45(2)(b)(ii), s 45(2)(a)(i), and s 45(2)(b)(i) of the Act in relation to Jin Ro, Ettamogah, Palms Village, and Global Beer deeds' 'Penalty and any other relief to be determined separately from all other issues' 'Time for filing notice of appeal extended...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment