Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v HJR Financial Services Pty Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 817
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the advertisements were misleading and deceptive; the first respondent does not provide loans itself, which is admitted. Orders are justified to restrain continued misleading advertisements and payment until proper material justifying exceptions is provided. The only exception currently proven is the American Express advertising charges, and balance of convenience supports orders pending trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Proceeding / Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['deceptive and Misleading Conduct' 'interlocutory Injunction' 'restraints on Advertisement' 'payment of Monies']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Proceeding / Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether advertisements published by the first respondent are misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive consumers' 'Whether respondents can be restrained from advertising or receiving payment pending determination' 'Application of s 87A Trade Practices Act 1974 to restrain payments']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the advertisements were misleading and deceptive; the first respondent does not provide loans itself, which is admitted. Orders are justified to restrain continued misleading advertisements and payment until proper material justifying exceptions is provided. The only exception currently proven is the American Express advertising charges, and balance of convenience supports orders pending trial.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['First respondent and associated persons restrained from advertising as per specified forms and representations until determination or earlier order.' 'First respondent to provide applicant 48 hours notice of terms of any proposed further advertisement prior to dispatch to advertisers.' 'Fifth respondent restrained...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment