ACCC v Michigan Group Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1631
Although the pleaded and particularised case was considered highly arguable to fail, determining the motion at this late stage would potentially embarrass the trial, any appeal could not be heard before the trial of the balance of the proceedings, and a successful appeal would compel the applicant to pursue the tenth respondent in a separate hearing; the Court therefore exercised its discretion against granting the relief claimed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Federal Court Civil Proceeding / Motion Brought at a Very Late Stage Before Trial
- Outcome
- Relief claimed in the motion refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['late Motion' 'discretion to Refuse Relief' 'trial Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Federal Court Civil Proceeding / Motion Brought at a Very Late Stage Before Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should grant the relief claimed in a motion brought at a very late stage.' 'Whether upholding the motion at that stage would be potentially embarrassing in the conduct of the trial.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the pleaded and particularised case was considered highly arguable to fail, determining the motion at this late stage would potentially embarrass the trial, any appeal could not be heard before the trial of the balance of the proceedings, and a successful appeal would compel the applicant to pursue the tenth respondent in a separate hearing; the Court therefore exercised its discretion against granting the relief claimed.
Court Disposition
Relief claimed in the motion refused.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment