Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 503
Privilege in relation to Mr O'Brien's draft statements was made out because the relevant purpose was to obtain legal advice, including with a view to using the material in anticipated litigation that was a real possibility; the involvement of legal advisers in information gathering for recommendations did not detract from privilege.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Application Concerning Privilege Over Draft Witness Statements in Response to a Notice to Produce / Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Privilege in relation to the draft statements of Mr O'Brien was made out; no orders were made.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'notice to Produce' 'draft Witness Statements' 'anticipated Litigation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Concerning Privilege Over Draft Witness Statements in Response to a Notice to Produce / Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether privilege had been made out in relation to the draft statements of Mr Leigh Christopher O'Brien." 'Whether the distinction between investigation of the matter and commencement of proceedings defeated the claim to privilege.']
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege in relation to Mr O'Brien's draft statements was made out because the relevant purpose was to obtain legal advice, including with a view to using the material in anticipated litigation that was a real possibility; the involvement of legal advisers in information gathering for recommendations did not detract from privilege.
Court Disposition
Privilege in relation to the draft statements of Mr O'Brien was made out; no orders were made.
Orders
- ['No orders made.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment