Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2001] FCA 1920

Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Ltd v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission [2001] FCA 1920

The appellants had demonstrated a sufficiently arguable case for leave to file a cross-claim for indemnity against the proposed cross-respondent; refusal of leave by the primary judge amounted to error as the proposed claim was not for contribution but indemnity, and the facts pleaded warranted leave to file the cross-claim.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 November 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal From a Judge's Decision Refusing Leave to File a Cross Claim
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'indemnity' 'cross Claims' 'jurisdiction' 'leave to Appeal']
['trade Practices Law'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'indemnity' 'cross Claims' 'jurisdiction' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal From a Judge's Decision Refusing Leave to File a Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether refusal to grant leave to file a cross-claim amounted to error of law' 'Whether the appellants had an arguable cause of action for indemnity under relevant legislation' 'Distinction between contribution and indemnity in statutory and equitable claims']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants had demonstrated a sufficiently arguable case for leave to file a cross-claim for indemnity against the proposed cross-respondent; refusal of leave by the primary judge amounted to error as the proposed claim was not for contribution but indemnity, and the facts pleaded warranted leave to file the cross-claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Orders of Nicholson J on 24 May 2001 are set aside.' "Appellants' motion dated 14 February 2001 is remitted to Nicholson J for determination." "Respondent to pay appellants' costs of the appeal and of the application for leave to appeal." "Costs of the appellants' motion before Nicholson J are reserved to him."]