Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 19

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Turi Foods Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 19

La Ionica’s advertising representations that its chickens were 'free to roam' were misleading and deceptive, given the actual stocking densities and conditions, in breach of s 52, s 53(a), and s 55 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and the equivalent provisions of the Australian Consumer Law; the agreed penalty and orders, including corrective advertising and compliance training, were appropriate and within the permissible range for deterrence and remedy.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 January 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceeding / Final Orders and Reasons for Judgment by Consent
Outcome
Declarations and orders made by consent.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations' 'consumer Protection' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'injunctions' 'declarations' 'compliance Programs']
['consumer Law' 'competition Law'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations' 'consumer Protection' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'injunctions' 'declarations' 'compliance Programs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil Penalty Proceeding / Final Orders and Reasons for Judgment by Consent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether La Ionica engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct or made false representations in contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and the Australian Consumer Law' 'Whether declaratory relief, injunctions, pecuniary penalties, publication and compliance orders should be made by consent']

Ratio Decidendi

La Ionica’s advertising representations that its chickens were 'free to roam' were misleading and deceptive, given the actual stocking densities and conditions, in breach of s 52, s 53(a), and s 55 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and the equivalent provisions of the Australian Consumer Law; the agreed penalty and orders, including corrective advertising and compliance training, were appropriate and within the permissible range for deterrence and remedy.

Court Disposition

Declarations and orders made by consent.

Orders

  • ['Declaration that La Ionica engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, false representations and conduct liable to mislead, in contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 and Australian Consumer Law.' 'La Ionica to cease use of specified misleading promotional materials within 30 days and to use best endeavours...