Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Imagine Essential Services Limited (No 2) [2008] FCA 446

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Imagine Essential Services Limited (No 2) [2008] FCA 446

The documentary evidence satisfied the Court that Triumphant conveyed the identified representations while acting as Imagine's marketing and promotional agent, and the affidavits and exhibits established their falsity. Because Triumphant agreed to settle on the basis of the specified contraventions and the proposed declarations and orders were within power, appropriate, and in the public interest, the Court made orders substantially in accordance with the proposed consent orders.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Trade Practices Act Proceeding Alleging Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Related Contraventions in the Promotion of Licences / Application for Consent Declarations and Injunctions Resolving the Proceeding Between the Applicant and the Third Respondent
Outcome
Consent declarations and orders made against the Third Respondent; no order as to costs between the Applicant and the Third Respondent.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false or Misleading Representations' 'consent Declarations' 'injunctions' 'compliance Program' 'corrective Notice']
['competition and Consumer Law' 'trade Practices'] ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false or Misleading Representations' 'consent Declarations' 'injunctions' 'compliance Program' 'corrective Notice']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Trade Practices Act Proceeding Alleging Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and Related Contraventions in the Promotion of Licences / Application for Consent Declarations and Injunctions Resolving the Proceeding Between the Applicant and the Third Respondent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Third Respondent, as marketing and promotional agent engaged by the First Respondent, made the Earnings Representations, Accountant Representations, Supplier Agreement Representations and Association Representations.' "Whether the Third Respondent's representations were false, misleading or deceptive and contravened ss 52, 53(c) and 59(2) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)." 'Whether it was appropriate to make consent declarations and orders, including injunctions, notices and compliance program orders.']

Ratio Decidendi

The documentary evidence satisfied the Court that Triumphant conveyed the identified representations while acting as Imagine's marketing and promotional agent, and the affidavits and exhibits established their falsity. Because Triumphant agreed to settle on the basis of the specified contraventions and the proposed declarations and orders were within power, appropriate, and in the public interest, the Court made orders substantially in accordance with the proposed consent orders.

Court Disposition

Consent declarations and orders made against the Third Respondent; no order as to costs between the Applicant and the Third Respondent.

Orders

  • ['Declared that the Third Respondent contravened s 52 and s 59(2) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by making the Earnings Representations without reasonable grounds.' 'Declared that the Third Respondent contravened s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by making the Accountant Representations.' 'Declared...