Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Dreamtime Creations Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1545
ADC's use of the name "Ubanoo Brown", certificates of authenticity, stamps, website descriptions and the eBay listing conveyed to reasonable consumers that the relevant artworks were painted, carved or otherwise produced by a person of Aboriginal descent or by Ubanoo Brown. Those representations were false because the works were not produced by such persons, and ADC thereby contravened s 52 of the TP Act. Mr Antoniou, as director and the person responsible for ADC's operations who caused or directed the representations, was knowingly concerned in the contraventions. The ACCC did not establish contraventions of s 53(eb) because the alleged country of origin representations were not made.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Practices Proceeding Alleging Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and False or Misleading Representations / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Declarations and injunctions granted for contraventions of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); alleged s 53(eb) country of origin contraventions not made out; corrective and costs orders made.
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false or Misleading Representations' 'aboriginal Art' 'country of Origin Representations' 'injunctive Relief' 'declarations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Trade Practices Proceeding Alleging Misleading or Deceptive Conduct and False or Misleading Representations / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether ADC represented that artworks were painted by a person of Aboriginal descent or by Ubanoo Brown when they were not.' 'Whether certificates of authenticity, stamps, website content and eBay listings conveyed misleading representations about Aboriginal authorship of artworks.' 'Whether ADC made false or misleading country of origin representations concerning carved wooden items imported from Indonesia and painted in Australia.' "Whether Tony Antoniou was knowingly involved in ADC's contraventions." 'What declaratory, injunctive and corrective relief should be ordered.']
Ratio Decidendi
ADC's use of the name "Ubanoo Brown", certificates of authenticity, stamps, website descriptions and the eBay listing conveyed to reasonable consumers that the relevant artworks were painted, carved or otherwise produced by a person of Aboriginal descent or by Ubanoo Brown. Those representations were false because the works were not produced by such persons, and ADC thereby contravened s 52 of the TP Act. Mr Antoniou, as director and the person responsible for ADC's operations who caused or directed the representations, was knowingly concerned in the contraventions. The ACCC did not establish contraventions of s 53(eb) because the alleged country of origin representations were not made.
Court Disposition
Declarations and injunctions granted for contraventions of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); alleged s 53(eb) country of origin contraventions not made out; corrective and costs orders made.
Orders
- ['The Court declared that the first respondent, from at least 19 June 2007 to January 2009, represented on its website that certain artworks were painted by a person of Aboriginal descent and by Ubanoo Brown when they were not, contravening s 52 of the TP Act.' 'The Court declared that the first respondent, from at...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment