ACCC v Eurong Beach Resort Ltd [2005] FCA 1900

ACCC v Eurong Beach Resort Ltd [2005] FCA 1900

On the agreed facts and joint submissions, and allowing for the respondents' co-operation and consequent savings of resources and costs, the Court was satisfied that the proposed declarations and penalties were appropriate and made orders in those terms.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Trade Practices Act Civil Penalty Proceeding / Final Declarations and Orders Following Agreed Facts and Joint Submissions
Outcome
Declarations of contraventions made; pecuniary penalties imposed on all respondents; respondents ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
Legal Topics
['misuse of Market Power' 'exclusionary Provisions' 'substantial Lessening of Competition' 'exclusive Dealing' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'costs']
['competition Law' 'trade Practices Law'] ['misuse of Market Power' 'exclusionary Provisions' 'substantial Lessening of Competition' 'exclusive Dealing' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'costs']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Trade Practices Act Civil Penalty Proceeding / Final Declarations and Orders Following Agreed Facts and Joint Submissions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondents contravened ss 45(2), 46 and 47(2) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by conduct in the market for transportation services by self-propelled barge between Inskip Point and Hook Point on Fraser Island.' "Whether the fourth and fifth respondents were knowingly concerned in and party to the corporate respondents' contraventions." 'Whether the proposed declarations, pecuniary penalties and costs order were appropriate.']

Ratio Decidendi

On the agreed facts and joint submissions, and allowing for the respondents' co-operation and consequent savings of resources and costs, the Court was satisfied that the proposed declarations and penalties were appropriate and made orders in those terms.

Court Disposition

Declarations of contraventions made; pecuniary penalties imposed on all respondents; respondents ordered to pay the applicant's costs.

Orders

  • ['The first respondent contravened s 46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).' "The fourth and fifth respondents were knowingly concerned in and party to the first respondent's contravention of s 46." 'The second and third respondents contravened s 45(2)(a)(i) and s 45(2)(a)(ii) by making arrangements or...