Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Monier Roofing Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 1062

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Monier Roofing Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 1062

The agreement reached between the parties was broadly in accord with what the Court would have done on the facts set out in the joint submissions, so orders were made in accordance with the short minutes handed up.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 December 1995
Procedural Posture
Proceeding for Recovery of Pecuniary Penalties Pursuant to B. 76 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 / Reasons for Judgment and Orders After Parties Reached Agreement on Disposition, Subject to the Court's Concurrence
Outcome
Orders made in accordance with the short minutes handed up by counsel and solicitors.
Legal Topics
['pecuniary Penalties' 'contraventions of S6. 45(2)(a) and 45(2)(b) of the Trade Practices Act 1974' 'agreed Disposition']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Proceeding for Recovery of Pecuniary Penalties Pursuant to B. 76 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 / Reasons for Judgment and Orders After Parties Reached Agreement on Disposition, Subject to the Court's Concurrence

  1. 1 ['Whether the agreed disposition and proposed orders for pecuniary penalties should be approved by the Court.']

Ratio Decidendi

The agreement reached between the parties was broadly in accord with what the Court would have done on the facts set out in the joint submissions, so orders were made in accordance with the short minutes handed up.

Court Disposition

Orders made in accordance with the short minutes handed up by counsel and solicitors.

Orders

  • ['The Court makes orders 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 as set out in the minutes.']