Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Monier Roofing Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 1062
The agreement reached between the parties was broadly in accord with what the Court would have done on the facts set out in the joint submissions, so orders were made in accordance with the short minutes handed up.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Proceeding for Recovery of Pecuniary Penalties Pursuant to B. 76 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 / Reasons for Judgment and Orders After Parties Reached Agreement on Disposition, Subject to the Court's Concurrence
- Outcome
- Orders made in accordance with the short minutes handed up by counsel and solicitors.
- Legal Topics
- ['pecuniary Penalties' 'contraventions of S6. 45(2)(a) and 45(2)(b) of the Trade Practices Act 1974' 'agreed Disposition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceeding for Recovery of Pecuniary Penalties Pursuant to B. 76 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 / Reasons for Judgment and Orders After Parties Reached Agreement on Disposition, Subject to the Court's Concurrence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the agreed disposition and proposed orders for pecuniary penalties should be approved by the Court.']
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement reached between the parties was broadly in accord with what the Court would have done on the facts set out in the joint submissions, so orders were made in accordance with the short minutes handed up.
Court Disposition
Orders made in accordance with the short minutes handed up by counsel and solicitors.
Orders
- ['The Court makes orders 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 as set out in the minutes.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment