ACCC v Rural Press Ltd [2001] FCA 1065
Substantial but proportionate monetary penalties for all respondents were appropriate given the deliberate anti-competitive conduct, the roles played, lack of pre-existing compliance culture, and the relatively limited effect of the conduct; court-ordered compliance programs were not imposed due to genuine existing programs and lack of demonstrated necessity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment (penalty and Injunctive Orders)
- Outcome
- Pecuniary penalties ordered; compliance program injunctions not imposed.
- Legal Topics
- ['pecuniary Penalties' 'injunctions' 'compliance Programs' 'abuse of Market Power' 'exclusionary Provisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment (penalty and Injunctive Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate pecuniary penalties for contraventions of ss 45 and 46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Appropriateness of court-ordered compliance programs under s 80 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Assessment of respondent roles in anti-competitive conduct']
Ratio Decidendi
Substantial but proportionate monetary penalties for all respondents were appropriate given the deliberate anti-competitive conduct, the roles played, lack of pre-existing compliance culture, and the relatively limited effect of the conduct; court-ordered compliance programs were not imposed due to genuine existing programs and lack of demonstrated necessity.
Court Disposition
Pecuniary penalties ordered; compliance program injunctions not imposed.
Orders
- ['Rural Press Limited to pay $400,000 pecuniary penalty to the Commonwealth.' 'Bridge Printing Office Pty Ltd to pay $200,000 pecuniary penalty to the Commonwealth.' 'Ian Law to pay $40,000 pecuniary penalty to the Commonwealth.' 'Trevor McAuliffe to pay $30,000 pecuniary penalty to the Commonwealth.' 'Paul Taylor...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment