Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Gullyside Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1727

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Gullyside Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1727

Appropriate penalties for price-fixing are to be assessed in light of the circumstances, gravity, deliberateness, market share, degree of cooperation, and deterrence objectives; in this case, $350,000 for OKN, $70,000 for Meribell, and $50,000 for Terence O'Keeffe reflect totality, degree of involvement, and general deterrence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2005
Procedural Posture
Penalty Hearing (civil Enforcement) / Judgment on Penalty
Outcome
Pecuniary penalties ordered against the second, third, and fifth respondents. Costs awarded to the applicant.
Legal Topics
['price Fixing' 'penalties Under Trade Practices Act 1974' 'deterrence' 'corporate and Individual Liability']
['competition Law' 'trade Practices'] ['price Fixing' 'penalties Under Trade Practices Act 1974' 'deterrence' 'corporate and Individual Liability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Penalty Hearing (civil Enforcement) / Judgment on Penalty

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What is the appropriate pecuniary penalty for contraventions of price-fixing prohibitions under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)?' 'What factors should be considered in assessing such a penalty for corporate and individual contraveners?']

Ratio Decidendi

Appropriate penalties for price-fixing are to be assessed in light of the circumstances, gravity, deliberateness, market share, degree of cooperation, and deterrence objectives; in this case, $350,000 for OKN, $70,000 for Meribell, and $50,000 for Terence O'Keeffe reflect totality, degree of involvement, and general deterrence.

Court Disposition

Pecuniary penalties ordered against the second, third, and fifth respondents. Costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • ["Second respondent (O'Keeffe Nominees Pty Ltd) to pay $350,000 pecuniary penalty within ninety days." 'Third respondent (Meribell Pty Ltd) to pay $70,000 pecuniary penalty within ninety days.' "Fifth respondent (Terence Edward John O'Keeffe) to pay $50,000 pecuniary penalty within ninety days." "Second, third, and...