Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Foamlite (Australia) Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 1543

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Foamlite (Australia) Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 1543

The proposed penalties and injunctions were reasonable and within the appropriate range because the respondents admitted long-running price fixing and market sharing conduct, the conduct affected a small but not insignificant part of the market, the corporate penalties were significant having regard to profit and deterrence, the companies had provided considerable assistance to the Commission, and the individual penalties or absence of penalties were justified by each individual's role and circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 December 1997
Procedural Posture
Trade Practices Proceeding for Pecuniary Penalties and Injunctions / Return of Application; Final Orders Made by Agreement After Admitted Contraventions
Outcome
Orders made imposing pecuniary penalties, injunctions, costs and confidentiality orders.
Legal Topics
['price Fixing' 'market Sharing' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'injunctions' 'agreed Penalties' 'part IV Contraventions']
['trade Practices' 'competition Law'] ['price Fixing' 'market Sharing' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'injunctions' 'agreed Penalties' 'part IV Contraventions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Trade Practices Proceeding for Pecuniary Penalties and Injunctions / Return of Application; Final Orders Made by Agreement After Admitted Contraventions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether pecuniary penalties and injunctions should be imposed for admitted contraventions of ss 45(2)(a) and 45(2)(b) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).' 'Whether the Court should make orders jointly proposed by the Commission and the respondents.' 'What penalties were appropriate having regard to the conduct, market impact, deterrence, cooperation with the Commission and the circumstances of the individual respondents.']

Ratio Decidendi

The proposed penalties and injunctions were reasonable and within the appropriate range because the respondents admitted long-running price fixing and market sharing conduct, the conduct affected a small but not insignificant part of the market, the corporate penalties were significant having regard to profit and deterrence, the companies had provided considerable assistance to the Commission, and the individual penalties or absence of penalties were justified by each individual's role and circumstances.

Court Disposition

Orders made imposing pecuniary penalties, injunctions, costs and confidentiality orders.

Orders

  • ['The first respondent pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $1,200,000 in respect of contraventions of ss 45(2)(a)(ii), 45(2)(b)(i) and 45(2)(b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).' 'The second respondent pay to the Commonwealth a pecuniary penalty of $600,000 in respect of contraventions of ss...