Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v McMahon Services Pty Ltd (ACN 008 274 020) (No 2) [2004] FCA 1172
SA Demolition and Mr Parentes admitted to a contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 45 by participating in a price-fixing arrangement with McMahon Services regarding demolition and asbestos removal tenders. The seriousness of the conduct and the need for deterrence justified penalties in the amounts of $65,625 and $35,000, respectively, with a 12.5% discount for cooperation. Both respondents had sufficient financial capacity to pay, and undertakings regarding future compliance were noted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment and Penalty Determination
- Outcome
- Penalties imposed; undertakings noted.
- Legal Topics
- ['price Fixing' 'penalties' 'anti Competitive Conduct' 'admission of Contravention' 'trade Practices Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment and Penalty Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether SA Demolition and Mr Parentes contravened ss 45(2)(a)(ii) and 45(2)(b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by participating in a price-fixing arrangement' 'Appropriate penalty for contraventions under s 76 of the Act' "Assessment of respondents' cooperation, financial capacity, and parity with other respondents"]
Ratio Decidendi
SA Demolition and Mr Parentes admitted to a contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 45 by participating in a price-fixing arrangement with McMahon Services regarding demolition and asbestos removal tenders. The seriousness of the conduct and the need for deterrence justified penalties in the amounts of $65,625 and $35,000, respectively, with a 12.5% discount for cooperation. Both respondents had sufficient financial capacity to pay, and undertakings regarding future compliance were noted.
Court Disposition
Penalties imposed; undertakings noted.
Orders
- ['The third respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a pecuniary penalty pursuant to s 76 of the Act in the sum of $65,625.' 'The fourth respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia a pecuniary penalty pursuant to s 76 of the Act in the sum of $35,000.' 'The third and fourth respondents are to give...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment