Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v J McPhee & Son (Australia) Pty Ltd & Ors (No.2) [1997] FCA 1013
It would be contrary to the absolute privilege against self-incrimination and exposure to a penalty for the court to direct natural person respondents in proceedings for pecuniary penalties to file and serve witness statements prior to trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Pecuniary Penalties Under Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth) / Application for Directions Regarding Witness Statements Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Directions for filing and serving witness statements by second to sixth respondents rescinded; costs of motion to be respondents' costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['privilege Against Self Incrimination' 'privilege Against Exposure to Penalty' 'witness Statements in Penalty Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Pecuniary Penalties Under Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth) / Application for Directions Regarding Witness Statements Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether natural person respondents in proceedings for pecuniary penalties must file and serve witness statements prior to trial' 'Whether privilege against exposure to a penalty precludes direction for witness statements']
Ratio Decidendi
It would be contrary to the absolute privilege against self-incrimination and exposure to a penalty for the court to direct natural person respondents in proceedings for pecuniary penalties to file and serve witness statements prior to trial.
Court Disposition
Directions for filing and serving witness statements by second to sixth respondents rescinded; costs of motion to be respondents' costs in the cause.
Orders
- ['The directions given on 2 June 1997 for the filing and serving of witness statements by the second to sixth respondent be rescinded.' "The costs of the second to sixth respondent's notice of the motion of 30 July 1997 to be the respondents' costs in the cause."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment