Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Westminster Retail Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1299

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Westminster Retail Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1299

Pecuniary penalties and injunctive relief are appropriate for admitted contraventions of s 48 of the Trade Practices Act involving resale price maintenance under franchise agreements. Factors including deterrence, nature and duration of conduct, size of business, family business character, lack of prior contraventions, partial cooperation, and inability to precisely quantify profit or consumer loss were considered in setting penalties toward the lower end of the scale ($100,000 for Westminster Retail Pty Ltd, $18,000 each for Mr and Mrs Wade). Additional orders require compliance programs and restrain conduct, with payment by instalments due to financial constraints.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 September 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment and Orders
Outcome
Declarations and final orders granted; penalties imposed; injunctive relief and compliance orders made
Legal Topics
['resale Price Maintenance' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'trade Practices Act Contraventions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment and Orders

  1. 1 ['What pecuniary penalties should be imposed on the respondents for admitted contraventions of s 48 of the Trade Practices Act involving resale price maintenance?' 'Factors relevant to penalty determination under s 76 of the Trade Practices Act for individuals knowingly involved in such contraventions']

Ratio Decidendi

Pecuniary penalties and injunctive relief are appropriate for admitted contraventions of s 48 of the Trade Practices Act involving resale price maintenance under franchise agreements. Factors including deterrence, nature and duration of conduct, size of business, family business character, lack of prior contraventions, partial cooperation, and inability to precisely quantify profit or consumer loss were considered in setting penalties toward the lower end of the scale ($100,000 for Westminster Retail Pty Ltd, $18,000 each for Mr and Mrs Wade). Additional orders require compliance programs and restrain conduct, with payment by instalments due to financial constraints.

Court Disposition

Declarations and final orders granted; penalties imposed; injunctive relief and compliance orders made

Orders

  • ['Westminster Retail Pty Ltd restrained for three years from engaging in resale price maintenance conduct relating to franchised goods' 'Kenneth John Wade and Heather Lorraine Wade restrained for three years from aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring resale price maintenance conduct by a company' 'Westminster...