Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (No 3) [2007] FCA 144
Edison contravened ss 45E(3) and 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by entering into an arrangement with the CEPU restricting engagement of contractors on the basis of certified agreements, and giving effect to that arrangement. A penalty of $120,000 is within the proper range given parity with the penalty imposed on the CEPU, Edison's cooperative conduct, admissions, absence of prior contraventions, and the public policy favouring prompt resolution.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; First Respondent: IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (formerly known as Edison Mission Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd) (ACN 055 563 696); Second Respondent: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment on Settlement and Penalty
- Outcome
- Pecuniary penalty imposed on First Respondent; costs ordered; declarations made as to contraventions.
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Trade Practices, Pecuniary Penalty, Arrangements Affecting Acquisition of Goods or Services, Determination of Penalty, Parity Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Applicant
IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (formerly known as Edison Mission Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd) (ACN 055 563 696)
First Respondent
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment on Settlement and Penalty
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the First Respondent contravene s 45E(3) and s 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by entering into and giving effect to an arrangement affecting acquisition of services?
- 2 What is the appropriate pecuniary penalty pursuant to s 76 for the admitted contraventions of Part IV of the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
Edison contravened ss 45E(3) and 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by entering into an arrangement with the CEPU restricting engagement of contractors on the basis of certified agreements, and giving effect to that arrangement. A penalty of $120,000 is within the proper range given parity with the penalty imposed on the CEPU, Edison's cooperative conduct, admissions, absence of prior contraventions, and the public policy favouring prompt resolution.
Court Disposition
Pecuniary penalty imposed on First Respondent; costs ordered; declarations made as to contraventions.
Orders
- First Respondent declared to have contravened s 45E(3) and s 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).
- First Respondent to pay a pecuniary penalty of $120,000 to the Commonwealth of Australia by 9 March 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment