Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 1777
A contract, arrangement or understanding was entered into between Edison and CEPU prior to and including August 2001, containing a provision committing Edison not to engage electrical contractors at Loy Yang B unless those contractors had a current certified agreement with CEPU. This provision was included for the operative purpose of preventing or hindering Edison from acquiring services from contractors without such an agreement—including DJN. Edison thereby contravened s 45E(3) and s 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), and CEPU is liable for aiding, abetting, and being knowingly concerned in and party to the contraventions.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; First Respondent: IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (formerly known as Edison Mission Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd) (ACN 055 563 696); Second Respondent: Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Declaration and final injunctions granted against the Second Respondent; ACCC entitled to declaration of CEPU’s accessorial liability; injunctive relief for three years.
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Trade Practices, Accessorial Liability, Contract, Arrangement or Understanding, Purpose Under Trade Practices Act, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Applicant
IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd (formerly known as Edison Mission Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd) (ACN 055 563 696)
First Respondent
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contract, arrangement or understanding between IPM Operation and Maintenance Loy Yang Pty Ltd and CEPU contravened ss 45E and 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
- 2 Whether CEPU is liable as an accessory under ss 76 and 80 of the Trade Practices Act
- 3 Whether the arrangement prevented or hindered the company from acquiring goods or services from certain contractors
Ratio Decidendi
A contract, arrangement or understanding was entered into between Edison and CEPU prior to and including August 2001, containing a provision committing Edison not to engage electrical contractors at Loy Yang B unless those contractors had a current certified agreement with CEPU. This provision was included for the operative purpose of preventing or hindering Edison from acquiring services from contractors without such an agreement—including DJN. Edison thereby contravened s 45E(3) and s 45EA of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), and CEPU is liable for aiding, abetting, and being knowingly concerned in and party to the contraventions.
Court Disposition
Declaration and final injunctions granted against the Second Respondent; ACCC entitled to declaration of CEPU’s accessorial liability; injunctive relief for three years.
Orders
- The Court declares CEPU aided, abetted, counselled, procured, induced, and was knowingly concerned in and party to Edison’s contravention of s 45E(3) of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).
- The Court declares CEPU counselled, procured, and induced Edison’s contravention of s 45EA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment