Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Competition Tribunal (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 127

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Competition Tribunal (No 2) [2006] FCAFC 127

The Court set aside and varied Tribunal orders only to the extent challenged, clarified the scope of the Tribunal's reconsideration, and found the ACCC's exercise of discretion in determining the Initial Capital Base was not unreasonable under the Code, remitting the matter for reconsideration according to law.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 August 2006
Procedural Posture
Application / Supplementary Reasons and Final Orders
Outcome
Orders partly set aside and varied; matter remitted to Tribunal; EAPL's motion dismissed except as specified; costs awarded to applicant.
Legal Topics
['setting Aside Tribunal Decision' 'initial Capital Base Determination' 'judicial Review' 'scope of Remitter']
['administrative Law' 'competition Law' 'energy Law'] ['setting Aside Tribunal Decision' 'initial Capital Base Determination' 'judicial Review' 'scope of Remitter']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Supplementary Reasons and Final Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether paragraph 1 of original Court order was too broad' "Whether ACCC's exercise of discretion was reasonable" 'Scope of Tribunal reconsideration' "Tribunal's errors in applying s 8.10 of the Code"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Court set aside and varied Tribunal orders only to the extent challenged, clarified the scope of the Tribunal's reconsideration, and found the ACCC's exercise of discretion in determining the Initial Capital Base was not unreasonable under the Code, remitting the matter for reconsideration according to law.

Court Disposition

Orders partly set aside and varied; matter remitted to Tribunal; EAPL's motion dismissed except as specified; costs awarded to applicant.

Orders

  • ['Paragraph 1 of the Court order dated 2 June 2006 is revoked.' 'Paragraph 1 of the Australian Competition Tribunal order of 19 May 2005 is varied: subparagraph (a) set aside; subparagraph (c) set aside as to reference to life of 60 years and proportion of Initial Capital Base of $834.66 million.' "Paragraphs 2 and...