Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1109
The potential prejudice to Baxter of removing the appeal from the November sittings outweighed the inconvenience to the Commission, particularly since competent junior or other available senior counsel could be briefed, and the Federal Court Rules favour early listing of appeals. Accordingly, the application to adjourn was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Listing of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Practices Act 1974 (cth)' 's 46 Misuse of Market Power' 's 47 Exclusive Dealing' 'crown Immunity' 'appellate Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Listing of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be removed from the November 2005 Full Federal Court sittings and relisted for February 2006' 'Balance of prejudice between parties if the listing is altered' "Relevance of preferred senior counsel's unavailability to interlocutory scheduling"]
Ratio Decidendi
The potential prejudice to Baxter of removing the appeal from the November sittings outweighed the inconvenience to the Commission, particularly since competent junior or other available senior counsel could be briefed, and the Federal Court Rules favour early listing of appeals. Accordingly, the application to adjourn was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for orders removing the appeal from the Full Federal Court list for the sittings commencing 31 October 2005 and listing the appeal for February 2006 is dismissed.' 'Costs of the application are costs in the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment