Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABG Pages Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 764

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABG Pages Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 764

The respondents admitted engaging in systemic unconscionable conduct involving misleading representations, persistent harassment, and contract terms that were unclear or unfair, in breach of sections 18, 21, 22, 29, and 50 of the Australian Consumer Law. The seriousness, duration, and deliberateness of the conduct, Ms McCullough's central role, and the detriment to affected consumers warranted declarations, injunctions, compliance program orders, a five-year disqualification for Ms McCullough, and pecuniary penalties of $300,000 (company) and $40,000 (individual). The Court adopted a five-year instalment plan for these penalties after weighing deterrence and evidence of financial resources.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Penalty Hearing (civil Enforcement Proceeding) / Judgment After Admissions and Penalty Hearing
Outcome
Declarations, injunctive relief, compliance program orders, pecuniary penalties, disqualification, and costs orders made against both respondents as appropriate.
Legal Topics
['unconscionable Conduct' 'false or Misleading Representations' 'injunctions' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'compliance Programs' 'disqualification From Managing Corporations' 'undue Harassment']
['consumer Law' 'commercial Law' 'corporate Law'] ['unconscionable Conduct' 'false or Misleading Representations' 'injunctions' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'compliance Programs' 'disqualification From Managing Corporations' 'undue Harassment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Penalty Hearing (civil Enforcement Proceeding) / Judgment After Admissions and Penalty Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondents contravened the Australian Consumer Law by engaging in unconscionable conduct, misleading or deceptive conduct, false or misleading representations, and undue harassment' 'Whether the Court should grant injunctions, compliance program orders, disqualification orders, declarations, and pecuniary penalties sought by the applicant']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents admitted engaging in systemic unconscionable conduct involving misleading representations, persistent harassment, and contract terms that were unclear or unfair, in breach of sections 18, 21, 22, 29, and 50 of the Australian Consumer Law. The seriousness, duration, and deliberateness of the conduct, Ms McCullough's central role, and the detriment to affected consumers warranted declarations, injunctions, compliance program orders, a five-year disqualification for Ms McCullough, and pecuniary penalties of $300,000 (company) and $40,000 (individual). The Court adopted a five-year instalment plan for these penalties after weighing deterrence and evidence of financial resources.

Court Disposition

Declarations, injunctive relief, compliance program orders, pecuniary penalties, disqualification, and costs orders made against both respondents as appropriate.

Orders

  • ['Declarations of contraventions of ACL made against ABG Pages and Ms McCullough' 'Injunctions restraining ABG Pages and Ms McCullough for 5 years from conduct involving automatically renewing contracts and misleading representations' 'ABG Pages restrained from enforcing pre-order contracts with automatic renewal...