Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Global Prepaid Communications Pty Ltd (ACN 095 154 108) (in Liq) [2005] FCA 592

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Global Prepaid Communications Pty Ltd (ACN 095 154 108) (in Liq) [2005] FCA 592

The third respondent was not entitled to further adjournment, as ample time had been afforded and court procedures cannot be set aside for party convenience.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 April 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Dismissal/application for Adjournment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
['adjournment' 'case Management']
['civil Procedure'] ['adjournment' 'case Management']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Dismissal/application for Adjournment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the third respondent is entitled to a further adjournment to take instructions regarding cross-examination and evidence']

Ratio Decidendi

The third respondent was not entitled to further adjournment, as ample time had been afforded and court procedures cannot be set aside for party convenience.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.' "The third respondent's application for adjournment is dismissed."]