Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Oceana Commercial Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1307
The ACCC should pay the costs thrown away by the adjournment, except those of the first, second, and fifth respondents, as the ACCC was primarily responsible for the wasted costs through its lack of communication regarding readiness, although these respondents' conduct also contributed to lateness in discovery. The circumstances do not justify indemnity costs or immediate taxation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Order in Ongoing Proceedings / Postponement of Trial, Interlocutory Hearing on Costs Due to Adjournment
- Outcome
- Costs thrown away by the adjournment to be paid by the applicant (ACCC) to certain respondents; indemnity costs and immediate taxation denied.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'adjournment' 'trial Preparation' 'discovery']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Order in Ongoing Proceedings / Postponement of Trial, Interlocutory Hearing on Costs Due to Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Who should bear the costs thrown away by the adjournment of the trial?' 'Were there grounds for ordering indemnity costs or immediate taxation of costs?']
Ratio Decidendi
The ACCC should pay the costs thrown away by the adjournment, except those of the first, second, and fifth respondents, as the ACCC was primarily responsible for the wasted costs through its lack of communication regarding readiness, although these respondents' conduct also contributed to lateness in discovery. The circumstances do not justify indemnity costs or immediate taxation.
Court Disposition
Costs thrown away by the adjournment to be paid by the applicant (ACCC) to certain respondents; indemnity costs and immediate taxation denied.
Orders
- ['The applicant pay the costs of the third, eleventh and twelfth respondents; the fourth respondent; the sixth respondent; the thirteenth respondent and the tenth cross-respondent; and the tenth respondent, thrown away by reason of the adjournment of the trial in these proceedings.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment