Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emerald Ocean Distributors Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 244
The respondents, through marketing materials and website statements, made absolute performance claims about the Slendertone products which were found to be misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Act 1987 (WA). These findings justified formal declarations, injunctive relief, corrective advertising, compliance training for the director personally involved, and a substantial but not complete costs order for the applicant.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Orders Following Delivery of Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations made; injunctions granted; corrective orders made; compliance training ordered; orders as to costs; cross-claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations' 'injunctive Relief' 'corrective Advertising' 'costs' 'declarations' 'compliance Training']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Orders Following Delivery of Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondents engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in contravention of s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and related provisions regarding the marketing of Slendertone products' 'Whether false or misleading representations were made as to the performance of those products' 'The appropriateness of injunctions, corrective orders and declarations of fact in the circumstances' 'Whether costs should be awarded to the applicant, including percentage amount']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondents, through marketing materials and website statements, made absolute performance claims about the Slendertone products which were found to be misleading or deceptive, or likely to mislead or deceive, in contravention of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and Fair Trading Act 1987 (WA). These findings justified formal declarations, injunctive relief, corrective advertising, compliance training for the director personally involved, and a substantial but not complete costs order for the applicant.
Court Disposition
Declarations made; injunctions granted; corrective orders made; compliance training ordered; orders as to costs; cross-claim dismissed
Orders
- ['Findings of fact made under s 83 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) against the first, second and third respondents as to nature and effect of representations in marketing certain products' 'Declarations that certain conduct contravened ss 52 and 53(c) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and equivalent Fair Trading...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment