Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v The Bio Enviro Plan Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 415
Leave is required and granted for costs and compensation orders sought after sixth and seventh respondents' bankruptcy, on the basis that the applications were made before bankruptcy and there is no prejudice to creditors. Costs are awarded on a joint and several basis, as there are no special circumstances to depart from the usual rule. The representative application is discontinued as it is futile in light of bankruptcy and asset status.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; First Respondent: The Bio Enviro Plan Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Buyplus Commodities Brokers Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: Greenstar Co-Operative Limited; Fourth Respondent: Greenstar Management Pty Ltd; Fifth Respondent: Kevin Robert Smith; Sixth Respondent: Paul Anthony Haigh; Seventh Respondent: Trevor Sampson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Liability Orders and Costs; Consideration of Compensation and Discontinuance of Representative Claims
- Outcome
- Leave granted for fresh steps post-bankruptcy; compensation and costs orders made; representative proceeding discontinued with no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, False Representations, Costs Orders, Compensation Orders, Representative Proceedings, Bankruptcy Leave for Fresh Steps
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Applicant
The Bio Enviro Plan Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Buyplus Commodities Brokers Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
Greenstar Co-Operative Limited
Third Respondent
Greenstar Management Pty Ltd
Fourth Respondent
Kevin Robert Smith
Fifth Respondent
Paul Anthony Haigh
Sixth Respondent
Trevor Sampson
Seventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Liability Orders and Costs; Consideration of Compensation and Discontinuance of Representative Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to take fresh steps against bankrupt respondents under s 58(3)(b) Bankruptcy Act
- 2 Whether costs orders and compensation orders should be made jointly and severally against all respondents
- 3 Whether the applicant should have leave to discontinue a representative application
Ratio Decidendi
Leave is required and granted for costs and compensation orders sought after sixth and seventh respondents' bankruptcy, on the basis that the applications were made before bankruptcy and there is no prejudice to creditors. Costs are awarded on a joint and several basis, as there are no special circumstances to depart from the usual rule. The representative application is discontinued as it is futile in light of bankruptcy and asset status.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for fresh steps post-bankruptcy; compensation and costs orders made; representative proceeding discontinued with no order as to costs.
Orders
- First to seventh respondents jointly and severally pay applicant's costs, in an amount to be determined by the Registrar.
- First to seventh respondents jointly and severally refund $20,886.85 to Francis Lee Lathlean as compensatory relief.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment