Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Malaysia Airline System Berhad (No 2) [2012] FCA 767
Malaysia Airlines Cargo contravened s 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by arriving at and giving effect to price-fixing arrangements on surcharges and fees for air cargo services from Indonesia to other countries including Australia, warranting a pecuniary penalty of $6 million and injunctive relief as jointly submitted by the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Penalty and injunctive relief granted by consent, proceedings otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['price Fixing' 'cartel Conduct' 'international Air Cargo' 'pecuniary Penalties' 'injunctions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Malaysia Airlines Cargo contravened s 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by engaging in cartel conduct' 'Whether penalty and injunctive relief are appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
Malaysia Airlines Cargo contravened s 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by arriving at and giving effect to price-fixing arrangements on surcharges and fees for air cargo services from Indonesia to other countries including Australia, warranting a pecuniary penalty of $6 million and injunctive relief as jointly submitted by the parties.
Court Disposition
Penalty and injunctive relief granted by consent, proceedings otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- ['The second respondent pay the Commonwealth of Australia a pecuniary penalty in the total sum of $6 million in respect of contraventions of ss 45(2)(a)(ii) and (b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), now the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), occurring after April 2004.' 'The pecuniary penalty of $6...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment