Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Link Solutions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 919
The case against Enterprise Finance Solutions and CIT Group (Australia) for accessorial liability under s 75B fails because there was no evidence they knew Axis Telecoms required customers to acquire equipment from a specified finance company or panel as a condition of call credits, as required under the proper construction of 'another person' in s 47(6) Trade Practices Act. Summary judgment is granted in their favour. Leave is granted to the applicant to replead regarding other respondents and aspects of the case.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; Applicant: Mark Pearson; Respondent: Link Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 214; Respondent: Service LS Pty Ltd ACN 103 836 326; Respondent: Axis Telecoms Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 205; Respondent: Service AT Pty Ltd ACN 076 804 718; Respondent: Sonofon Pty Ltd ACN 126 249 625; Respondent: Service SO Pty Ltd ACN 103 970 627; Respondent: Telecom One Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 394; Respondent: Service TO Pty Ltd ACN 116 646 916; Respondent: George Tawaf; Respondent: Mark Nesbitt; Respondent: John Masia; Respondent: Barry Kennedy; Respondent: WorldTel (Aust) Pty Ltd ACN 105 597 091; Respondent: WorldTel Corporation (Victoria) Pty Ltd ACN 109 699 425; Respondent: Skylink Communications Pty Ltd ACN 112 018 809; Respondent: Romeo Wehbe; Respondent: Manoel Wehbe; Respondent: Fakhr Fakhr; Respondent: Joseph Ayoub; Respondent: Australian Integrated Finance Pty Ltd ACN 078 700 044; Respondent: Enterprise Finance Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 101 737 204; Respondent: CIT Group (Australia) Limited ACN 065 745 735; Respondent: Queensland Communication Company Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 385; Respondent: Service QCC Pty Ltd ACN 113 079 600; Respondent: Clear Communications (Euraust) AB; Respondent: Clear Telecoms (Aust) Pty Ltd ACN 129 296 573; Respondent: Anthony Hakim; Respondent: National Telecoms Group Pty Ltd ACN 094 312 704
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory (summary Judgment and Strike Out Applications, Leave to Replead Granted)
- Outcome
- Partial summary judgment granted (EFS and CIT). Leave to replead granted. Other summary judgment applications dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Exclusive Dealing, Third Line Forcing, Summary Judgment, Pleadings, Accessorial Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Applicant
Mark Pearson
Applicant
Link Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 214
Respondent
Service LS Pty Ltd ACN 103 836 326
Respondent
Axis Telecoms Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 205
Respondent
Service AT Pty Ltd ACN 076 804 718
Respondent
Sonofon Pty Ltd ACN 126 249 625
Respondent
Service SO Pty Ltd ACN 103 970 627
Respondent
Telecom One Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 394
Respondent
Service TO Pty Ltd ACN 116 646 916
Respondent
George Tawaf
Respondent
Mark Nesbitt
Respondent
John Masia
Respondent
Barry Kennedy
Respondent
WorldTel (Aust) Pty Ltd ACN 105 597 091
Respondent
WorldTel Corporation (Victoria) Pty Ltd ACN 109 699 425
Respondent
Skylink Communications Pty Ltd ACN 112 018 809
Respondent
Romeo Wehbe
Respondent
Manoel Wehbe
Respondent
Fakhr Fakhr
Respondent
Joseph Ayoub
Respondent
Australian Integrated Finance Pty Ltd ACN 078 700 044
Respondent
Enterprise Finance Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 101 737 204
Respondent
CIT Group (Australia) Limited ACN 065 745 735
Respondent
Queensland Communication Company Pty Ltd ACN 126 049 385
Respondent
Service QCC Pty Ltd ACN 113 079 600
Respondent
Clear Communications (Euraust) AB
Respondent
Clear Telecoms (Aust) Pty Ltd ACN 129 296 573
Respondent
Anthony Hakim
Respondent
National Telecoms Group Pty Ltd ACN 094 312 704
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory (summary Judgment and Strike Out Applications, Leave to Replead Granted)
Legal Issues
- 1 Construction of 'another person' in s 47(6) Trade Practices Act
- 2 Attributes of compulsion and futurity in s 47(6)
- 3 Knowledge requirements for accessorial liability under s 75B
Ratio Decidendi
The case against Enterprise Finance Solutions and CIT Group (Australia) for accessorial liability under s 75B fails because there was no evidence they knew Axis Telecoms required customers to acquire equipment from a specified finance company or panel as a condition of call credits, as required under the proper construction of 'another person' in s 47(6) Trade Practices Act. Summary judgment is granted in their favour. Leave is granted to the applicant to replead regarding other respondents and aspects of the case.
Court Disposition
Partial summary judgment granted (EFS and CIT). Leave to replead granted. Other summary judgment applications dismissed.
Orders
- The matter be stood over to 30 August 2010 at 9:30 am for consideration of proposed orders.
- Applicant's amended statement of claim struck out as against EFS and CIT; leave granted to file second amended statement of claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment