Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Davies (No 2) [2015] FCA 1290
Given the seriousness of the offence, the need for general deterrence, Mr Davies' lack of contrition, partial cooperation, and financial circumstances, a community service order for 200 hours under s 20AB(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) is the appropriate penalty rather than imprisonment or a fine.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Respondent convicted; order for community service made.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'breach of S 155 Trade Practices Act' 'aiding and Abetting' 'community Service Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What is the appropriate sentence for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring a company's failure to comply with a notice under s 155(1) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)?"]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the seriousness of the offence, the need for general deterrence, Mr Davies' lack of contrition, partial cooperation, and financial circumstances, a community service order for 200 hours under s 20AB(1) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) is the appropriate penalty rather than imprisonment or a fine.
Court Disposition
Respondent convicted; order for community service made.
Orders
- ['The respondent is convicted of the offence of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring Natural Food Vending Pty Ltd in failing to comply with a notice issued to it under s 155(1) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) contrary to s 155(5)(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).' 'Pursuant to s 20AB of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment