Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd & Ors [1997] FCA 1255
Leave granted to join Adway Holdings Pty Ltd and Nick Kritharas Holdings Pty Ltd as respondents based on sufficient material indicating they were undisclosed principals and engaged in alleged misleading conduct through Top Snack. Mareva injunction granted against Kritharas and Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd as there is a real danger of asset dissipation, but Gatsios not added as respondent due to lack of cause of action; injunction terms modified to allow minimal withdrawals for infant beneficiaries and extension of affidavit filing time.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission; First Respondent: Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: George Manera; Third Respondent: Nicholas Kritharas; Fourth Respondent: Selina Manera; Proposed Respondent: Nick Kritharas Holdings Pty Ltd; Proposed Respondent: Adway Holdings Pty Ltd; Third Party to Proceedings: Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion in Ongoing Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Joinder and Mareva Injunction
- Outcome
- Leave granted for joinder of Adway and Kritharas; Mareva injunction granted against Kritharas and Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd; leave refused to add Gatsios as respondent; various procedural and protective orders made.
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Mareva Injunction, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
Applicant
Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd
First Respondent
George Manera
Second Respondent
Nicholas Kritharas
Third Respondent
Selina Manera
Fourth Respondent
Nick Kritharas Holdings Pty Ltd
Proposed Respondent
Adway Holdings Pty Ltd
Proposed Respondent
Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd
Third Party to Proceedings
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion in Ongoing Proceeding / Interlocutory Application for Joinder and Mareva Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether proposed amended pleadings disclose any proper cause of action against proposed respondents
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to join additional respondents
- 3 Whether Mareva injunction should be granted against third party to proceeding
Ratio Decidendi
Leave granted to join Adway Holdings Pty Ltd and Nick Kritharas Holdings Pty Ltd as respondents based on sufficient material indicating they were undisclosed principals and engaged in alleged misleading conduct through Top Snack. Mareva injunction granted against Kritharas and Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd as there is a real danger of asset dissipation, but Gatsios not added as respondent due to lack of cause of action; injunction terms modified to allow minimal withdrawals for infant beneficiaries and extension of affidavit filing time.
Court Disposition
Leave granted for joinder of Adway and Kritharas; Mareva injunction granted against Kritharas and Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd; leave refused to add Gatsios as respondent; various procedural and protective orders made.
Orders
- Leave to file Further Amended Application and Second Further Amended Statement of Claim joining Adway Holdings Pty Ltd and Nick Kritharas Holdings Pty Ltd as respondents.
- Mareva injunction restraining Gatsios Holdings Pty Ltd from dealing with assets, subject to exemption for withdrawals under $200 for infant beneficiaries.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment