Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Purchasing & Tender Service Pty Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 1781

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Australian Purchasing & Tender Service Pty Ltd & Ors [1998] FCA 1781

APTS, through the distribution of misleading documents and representations regarding government affiliation and mandatory registration, engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of ss 52, 53(aa), 53(c), 53(d), 53(f), and 55A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); Johnston and Andela were knowingly concerned in such contraventions and were therefore liable for orders restraining similar conduct and for costs.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Orders Under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth) / Final Judgment
Outcome
Declarations made; respondents restrained from engaging in specified conduct; orders for costs; liberty to apply for further orders.
Legal Topics
['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations' 'business Registration' 'restraining Orders']
['trade Practices' 'consumer Protection'] ['misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations' 'business Registration' 'restraining Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Orders Under the Trade Practices Act 1974 (cth) / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether conduct of APTS constituted misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Whether APTS made false representations as to standard, quality, value, approval, affiliation or need for services under ss 53(aa), 53(c), 53(d), 53(f)' 'Whether conduct was liable to mislead the public as to nature, characteristics, suitability for purpose under s 55A' 'Whether Johnston and Andela were involved in contraventions under s 75B']

Ratio Decidendi

APTS, through the distribution of misleading documents and representations regarding government affiliation and mandatory registration, engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct in contravention of ss 52, 53(aa), 53(c), 53(d), 53(f), and 55A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); Johnston and Andela were knowingly concerned in such contraventions and were therefore liable for orders restraining similar conduct and for costs.

Court Disposition

Declarations made; respondents restrained from engaging in specified conduct; orders for costs; liberty to apply for further orders.

Orders

  • ['APTS found to have engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct contrary to s 52 of the Act.' 'APTS found to have made false representations contrary to ss 53(aa), 53(c), 53(d), 53(f) of the Act.' 'APTS found to have engaged in conduct liable to mislead the public contrary to s 55A of the Act.' 'Johnston and Andela...