Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Woolworths (South Australia) Pty Limited (No 2) [2004] FCA 128
Respondents engaged in conduct amounting to price fixing in contravention of s 45(2)(a)(ii) and s 45(2)(b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act by entering into and giving effect to an agreement not to sell certain alcoholic beverages at discounted prices; the Court is satisfied to make consent declaratory and injunctive orders and note undertakings including a donation to a third party as part of the settlement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Proceeding / Judgment Following Consent Orders and Undertakings
- Outcome
- Consent declaratory and injunctive orders made; Court noted the undertakings and made no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['price Fixing' 'undertakings' 'consent Orders' 'restrictive Trade Practices']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Proceeding / Judgment Following Consent Orders and Undertakings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether respondents engaged in conduct in contravention of s 45(2)(a)(ii) and s 45(2)(b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Whether the Court should make declaratory and injunctive orders by consent' 'Whether undertakings to pay a sum of money to a third party as part of resolution are appropriate']
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents engaged in conduct amounting to price fixing in contravention of s 45(2)(a)(ii) and s 45(2)(b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act by entering into and giving effect to an agreement not to sell certain alcoholic beverages at discounted prices; the Court is satisfied to make consent declaratory and injunctive orders and note undertakings including a donation to a third party as part of the settlement.
Court Disposition
Consent declaratory and injunctive orders made; Court noted the undertakings and made no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['Declarations of contravention of s 45(2)(a)(ii) and s 45(2)(b)(ii) of the Trade Practices Act against first, second, and third respondents.' 'Declarations as to fourth, fifth and sixth respondents aiding, abetting, counselling or being knowingly concerned in contraventions.' 'Third respondent and fourth, fifth and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment