Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Bio Enviro Plan Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 232
Corporate respondents (first to fourth) are directly liable for breaches of Pt V of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) relating to misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, referral selling and pyramid selling. Fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents are accessorily liable as they had actual knowledge and were knowingly concerned in the contraventions. The case against the ninth respondent is not made out, as he lacked relevant knowledge or participation in essential matters.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Declarations and injunctive relief to be granted against corporate and accessorial respondents except the ninth respondent. Orders to be settled on hearing parties.
- Legal Topics
- ['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'false Representations' 'referral Selling' 'wrongful Acceptance of Payment' 'pyramid Selling' 'accessorial Liability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether respondents engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)' 'Whether respondents made false representations under s 53 and s 59(2)' 'Whether respondents engaged in referral selling or pyramid selling under ss 57 and 61' 'Whether respondents, specifically the fifth, sixth, seventh, and ninth, were accessorily liable under s 80(1)(e)']
Ratio Decidendi
Corporate respondents (first to fourth) are directly liable for breaches of Pt V of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) relating to misleading or deceptive conduct, false representations, referral selling and pyramid selling. Fifth, sixth, and seventh respondents are accessorily liable as they had actual knowledge and were knowingly concerned in the contraventions. The case against the ninth respondent is not made out, as he lacked relevant knowledge or participation in essential matters.
Court Disposition
Declarations and injunctive relief to be granted against corporate and accessorial respondents except the ninth respondent. Orders to be settled on hearing parties.
Orders
- ['Parties to be heard on draft formulation of orders.' 'Declarations and injunctions (including mandatory and corrective orders) to be made against all respondents except the ninth respondent; specific final terms to be settled.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment