Australian Education Union v Department of Training & Employment [2002] FCA 1149
The proceedings were in a matter arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) because the declarations obtained by the applicant depended on the continuance of rights and obligations created by the prior certified agreement and on the continuing paramount operation of that agreement and s 152 of the Act, which by s 109 of the Constitution prevented valid registration of the proposed State agreements. Section 347 therefore applied to preclude a costs order in favour of the successful applicant, and there was no basis identified that the proceedings had been instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Law Costs Motion / Motion for Costs of the Action Determined on Written Submissions After Declarations Had Been Made
- Outcome
- The applicant's motion for costs was dismissed and there was no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['recoverability of Costs in Proceedings Arising Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (cth)' 'certified Agreements' 'state Workplace Agreements' 'federal Court Jurisdiction Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (cth) and Judiciary Act 1903 (cth)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Industrial Law Costs Motion / Motion for Costs of the Action Determined on Written Submissions After Declarations Had Been Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's successful proceedings for declarations were proceedings in a matter arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) for the purposes of s 347." "Whether s 347 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) precluded an order that the respondents pay the applicant's costs."]
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were in a matter arising under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) because the declarations obtained by the applicant depended on the continuance of rights and obligations created by the prior certified agreement and on the continuing paramount operation of that agreement and s 152 of the Act, which by s 109 of the Constitution prevented valid registration of the proposed State agreements. Section 347 therefore applied to preclude a costs order in favour of the successful applicant, and there was no basis identified that the proceedings had been instituted vexatiously or without reasonable cause.
Court Disposition
The applicant's motion for costs was dismissed and there was no order as to costs.
Orders
- ["The applicant's motion for costs is dismissed." 'The parties are to bear their own costs of the motion.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment