AEC v Bennetts [2001] FCA 1779
On the evidence, the format and content of the Senate how to vote card is likely to mislead or deceive electors because of its inaccurate headings and the order and instructions differing from the actual Senate ballot paper; thus an interlocutory injunction is appropriate.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Electoral Commission; First Respondent: Lyn Bennetts; Second Respondent: Robert Makley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Injunction / Interlocutory Orders on Urgent Application
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct in Election Materials, Distribution of How to Vote Cards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Electoral Commission
Applicant
Lyn Bennetts
First Respondent
Robert Makley
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunction / Interlocutory Orders on Urgent Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the distribution of how to vote cards by the respondents contravened s 329 of the Electoral Act 1918 (Cth)
- 2 Whether an injunction should be granted under s 383 of the Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) to restrain the distribution of misleading how to vote cards
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, the format and content of the Senate how to vote card is likely to mislead or deceive electors because of its inaccurate headings and the order and instructions differing from the actual Senate ballot paper; thus an interlocutory injunction is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted
Orders
- The respondents are restrained from distributing or counselling or encouraging any other person to distribute how to vote cards produced by Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party for the House of Representatives division of Indi and for the half Senate election for the State of Victoria in the form of exhibits A1 and A2...
- Liberty to the respondents to apply to the Court on short notice for orders varying or dissolving the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment