Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Provident Capital Ltd (No 4) [2012] FCA 1506
The Court found that the process of notice and voting by debenture holders was adequate, the majority approved the amendment, and the payment waterfall should be amended as proposed. Receivers and trustee are justified in acting on the amendment and making payments per its terms.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Orders Following Meeting of Debenture Holders
- Outcome
- Orders made authorising amendment of the Debenture Trust Deed and payment to debenture holders under its amended terms.
- Legal Topics
- ['debenture Trust Deed Amendment' 'payment Waterfall' 'receivership' 'debenture Holder Meeting']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Orders Following Meeting of Debenture Holders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether receivers are justified in amending clause 11.5 of the Debenture Trust Deed' 'Whether payments to debenture holders can be made in accordance with the amended deed']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the process of notice and voting by debenture holders was adequate, the majority approved the amendment, and the payment waterfall should be amended as proposed. Receivers and trustee are justified in acting on the amendment and making payments per its terms.
Court Disposition
Orders made authorising amendment of the Debenture Trust Deed and payment to debenture holders under its amended terms.
Orders
- ['Defendant, by its receivers, authorised to amend clause 11.5 of Debenture Trust Deed as specified.' 'Plaintiff authorised to approve the amendment.' 'Defendant, by its receivers, authorised to make payments to debenture holders in accordance with amended Deed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment