Australian Executor Trustees Ltd v Nedanovski [2013] NSWSC 2024
The affidavit material satisfied the Court that Chris Nedanovski was the same person who now called himself Chris or Christopher Sazdanoff, and r 36.16(3) UCPR permitted the judgment to be varied to identify the Judgment Debtor by those names.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application to Vary Judgment Under the Slip Rule by Amending the Name of the Judgment Debtor
- Outcome
- Judgment varied.
- Legal Topics
- ['judgments' 'power to Vary Judgment' 'slip Rule' "amendment of Judgment Debtor's Name"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application to Vary Judgment Under the Slip Rule by Amending the Name of the Judgment Debtor
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the judgment should be varied to identify the Judgment Debtor by other names he is shown to have used.' "Whether r 36.16(3) UCPR is wide enough to permit the judgment debtor's name to be amended in the judgment."]
Ratio Decidendi
The affidavit material satisfied the Court that Chris Nedanovski was the same person who now called himself Chris or Christopher Sazdanoff, and r 36.16(3) UCPR permitted the judgment to be varied to identify the Judgment Debtor by those names.
Court Disposition
Judgment varied.
Orders
- ['That the name of the Judgment Debtor be amended to read "Chris Nedanovski also known as Christopher Nedanovski also known as Chris Sazdanoff also known as Christopher Sazdanoff".' 'Orders to be entered forthwith.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment