In the matter of Australian Hotel Acquisition (in liquidation) and Other Companies; [2011] NSWSC 1441
Once the offices of trustee were vacated, the companies held the trust assets as bare trustees, but work remained necessary to preserve and deal with the trust assets. Because that work had to be done by someone, was appropriately done by a professional liquidator, and the expenses and remuneration had been approved by meetings of trust creditors, the Court should approve the paid and unpaid expenses and remuneration and provide for further remuneration to be approved by creditors before payment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations; Companies in Liquidation; Trusts / Originating Process Seeking Orders or Advice Concerning Liquidators' Expenses and Remuneration
- Outcome
- Orders made in terms of paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 of the Short Minutes of Order initialled and dated 24 November 2011.
- Legal Topics
- ['companies in Liquidation' 'unit Trusts' 'bare Trustee' 'liquidator Remuneration' "administrators' Expenses" 'court Directions and Advice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations; Companies in Liquidation; Trusts / Originating Process Seeking Orders or Advice Concerning Liquidators' Expenses and Remuneration
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether administrators and liquidators were justified in making payments, and are justified in making further payments, for expenses and remuneration incurred in connection with trust assets after the companies' offices as trustees had been vacated." 'Whether remuneration could be allowed where the companies in administration and liquidation held the former trust assets as bare trustees.' "Whether s 579G(1)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001, s 511(1) of the Corporations Act 2001, s 63 of the Trustee Act 1925, or the Court's inherent jurisdiction provided an appropriate basis for the orders sought."]
Ratio Decidendi
Once the offices of trustee were vacated, the companies held the trust assets as bare trustees, but work remained necessary to preserve and deal with the trust assets. Because that work had to be done by someone, was appropriately done by a professional liquidator, and the expenses and remuneration had been approved by meetings of trust creditors, the Court should approve the paid and unpaid expenses and remuneration and provide for further remuneration to be approved by creditors before payment.
Court Disposition
Orders made in terms of paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 11 of the Short Minutes of Order initialled and dated 24 November 2011.
Orders
- ['The Court makes orders in terms of paragraphs 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11 of the Short Minutes of Order initialled and dated 24 November 2011.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment