Australian Iron & Steel Ltd v Dobb [1958] HCA 26

Australian Iron & Steel Ltd v Dobb [1958] HCA 26

By majority, the dispute concerning Arthur William Hunt's restoration or re-employment as deputy was an industrial matter within the broad definition in the Coal Industry Act 1946-1951 N.S.W., and there was sufficient evidence of a dispute for the Local Coal Authority to have jurisdiction. The provisions of the Coal Mines Regulation Act 1912-1953 N.S.W. requiring the mine manager to appoint a competent deputy did not displace or exclude the Local Coal Authority's industrial powers. The Supreme Court was therefore right to discharge the order nisi for prohibition.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning an Order Nisi for a Writ of Prohibition Against a Local Coal Authority / Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales Order Discharging the Order Nisi
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['writ of Prohibition' 'jurisdiction of Local Coal Authority' 'industrial Dispute' 'industrial Matter' 'appointment or Reinstatement of Coal Mine Deputy']
['administrative Law' 'industrial Law' 'mining Law'] ['writ of Prohibition' 'jurisdiction of Local Coal Authority' 'industrial Dispute' 'industrial Matter' 'appointment or Reinstatement of Coal Mine Deputy']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Concerning an Order Nisi for a Writ of Prohibition Against a Local Coal Authority / Appeal From the Supreme Court of New South Wales Order Discharging the Order Nisi

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Local Coal Authority had power to hear and determine the application concerning Arthur William Hunt's restoration or re-employment as deputy at Nebo Colliery." "Whether the dispute about Hunt's restoration to deputy was a dispute as to an industrial matter within the Coal Industry Act 1946-1951 N.S.W." 'Whether the Coal Mines Regulation Act 1912-1953 N.S.W. provisions requiring a mine manager to appoint a competent deputy displaced the prima facie jurisdiction of the Local Coal Authority.']

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the dispute concerning Arthur William Hunt's restoration or re-employment as deputy was an industrial matter within the broad definition in the Coal Industry Act 1946-1951 N.S.W., and there was sufficient evidence of a dispute for the Local Coal Authority to have jurisdiction. The provisions of the Coal Mines Regulation Act 1912-1953 N.S.W. requiring the mine manager to appoint a competent deputy did not displace or exclude the Local Coal Authority's industrial powers. The Supreme Court was therefore right to discharge the order nisi for prohibition.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']