AMWU v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association [2012] FCA 1074

AMWU v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association [2012] FCA 1074

There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the respondent may lawfully enrol AMEs as members and represent their industrial interests under its current rules. The balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo and restraining the respondent from such acts until the final hearing, given admission before FWA that such representation/membership is not currently permitted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 September 2012
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Interlocutory injunction granted
Legal Topics
['union Membership' 'eligibility Rule' 'interlocutory Injunction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Orders

  1. 1 ['Whether the respondent may enrol Aircraft Maintenance Engineers (AMEs) as members under current rules' 'Whether interlocutory restraint should be ordered pending final determination' 'Whether respondent has made false/misleading statements about workplace rights']

Ratio Decidendi

There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the respondent may lawfully enrol AMEs as members and represent their industrial interests under its current rules. The balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo and restraining the respondent from such acts until the final hearing, given admission before FWA that such representation/membership is not currently permitted.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory injunction granted

Orders

  • ['The respondent and its officers, employees and agents are restrained from enrolling or recruiting as members or representing industrially any person employed or engaged as an AME (except in accordance with Rule 3.2).' 'The respondent and its officers, employees and agents are restrained from soliciting or...