Australian Maritime Officers' Union v Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCAFC 45
The Minister's power under s 9A(6) to make exceptions for offshore resources activities does not extend to wholly extinguishing the content of activities identified in s 9A(5)(a) and (b); such a power was intended by Parliament to be limited to excepting particular activities or operations, not to render the deeming provision and associated visa requirements otiose. The relevant Determination, by excepting all activities and thus eviscerating the operative provisions, is ultra vires and invalid.
- Parties
- Appellant: Australian Maritime Officers' Union; Appellant: The Maritime Union of Australia; First Respondent: Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: The Commonwealth of Australia
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Decision (on Appeal From Primary Judge)
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Migration Zone, Ministerial Powers, Validity of Delegated Legislation, Ultra Vires, Offshore Resources Activity, Visa Requirements for Offshore Workers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Maritime Officers' Union
Appellant
The Maritime Union of Australia
Appellant
Assistant Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
The Commonwealth of Australia
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Decision (on Appeal From Primary Judge)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Determination (IMMI 14/077) made under s 9A(6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was valid or ultra vires
- 2 Proper construction and scope of the Minister's power under s 9A(6) to except 'offshore resources activity' from s 9A(5)
- 3 Whether the Minister may wholly except all operations or activities and thus render the provision otiose
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister's power under s 9A(6) to make exceptions for offshore resources activities does not extend to wholly extinguishing the content of activities identified in s 9A(5)(a) and (b); such a power was intended by Parliament to be limited to excepting particular activities or operations, not to render the deeming provision and associated visa requirements otiose. The relevant Determination, by excepting all activities and thus eviscerating the operative provisions, is ultra vires and invalid.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed
Orders
- The appeals are allowed.
- The orders made by the primary judge on 15 September 2014 are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment