AUSTRALIAN POSTAL COMMISSION v ABALOS [1991] NSWCA 10

AUSTRALIAN POSTAL COMMISSION v ABALOS [1991] NSWCA 10

The failure of the defendant to provide proper supervision and training to ensure correct posture was a breach of duty, and such supervision would have minimised the risk of injury to the plaintiff. As the risk was foreseeable and there were reasonably available means to obviate it, liability was established.

Parties
Appellant: Australian Postal Commission; Respondent: Abalos
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 November 1991
Procedural Posture
Civil / Remitted From High Court to Court of Appeal for Determination of Outstanding Issues
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Negligence, Damages, Employer's Duty of Care
Tort Employment Negligence Damages Employer's Duty of Care

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Australian Postal Commission

Appellant

Abalos

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Remitted From High Court to Court of Appeal for Determination of Outstanding Issues

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's failure to supervise and train the plaintiff to maintain proper posture constituted negligence
  2. 2 Whether proper supervision would have prevented or minimised the risk of injury
  3. 3 Whether damages awarded were excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The failure of the defendant to provide proper supervision and training to ensure correct posture was a breach of duty, and such supervision would have minimised the risk of injury to the plaintiff. As the risk was foreseeable and there were reasonably available means to obviate it, liability was established.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Judgment for the plaintiff on the issue of liability.
  • Appeal dismissed with costs.