X and Y v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2007] FCA 1622

X and Y v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority [2007] FCA 1622

Suppression orders are refused because, even without such orders, only the parties' names and legal issues would be publicly known, not the background facts, and because information identifying the applicants is already in the public domain.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Motion for Suppression Order Prior to Final Hearing
Outcome
Motions for suppression orders dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
['suppression Orders' 'publication of Party Names' 'case Management']
['administrative Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['suppression Orders' 'publication of Party Names' 'case Management']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Administrative Appeals Tribunal / Motion for Suppression Order Prior to Final Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal has power to prohibit publication of party names and to use pseudonyms in proceedings under certain legislation.' 'Whether a suppression order should be made in these appeal proceedings.']

Ratio Decidendi

Suppression orders are refused because, even without such orders, only the parties' names and legal issues would be publicly known, not the background facts, and because information identifying the applicants is already in the public domain.

Court Disposition

Motions for suppression orders dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • ['The motion brought by amended notice of motion filed in Court on 15 October 2007 be dismissed (NSD 1904/2007).' "The applicants pay the respondent's costs of the motion (NSD 1904/2007)." 'The motion brought by notice of motion filed in Court on 15 October 2007 be dismissed (NSD 2052/2007).' "The applicants pay the...