ASIC v MICHALIK [2004] NSWSC 966
Access to parts of the requested affidavits should be granted to the applicant, subject to masking of certain names and exclusion of exhibits and annexures, as this properly balances the competing public interests involved.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Australian Securities and Investments Commission; First Defendant: Andrzej Janusz Michalik also known as Andre Tomaszewski and Stanislaw Konstanty Krawczyk; Second Defendant: Martin Michalik; Third Defendant: Kilahim Pty Ltd; Applicant: Vanda Carson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Access to Court Documents, Open Justice, Balancing Public Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Plaintiff
Andrzej Janusz Michalik also known as Andre Tomaszewski and Stanislaw Konstanty Krawczyk
First Defendant
Martin Michalik
Second Defendant
Kilahim Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Vanda Carson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a journalist should be granted access to affidavits on the court file subject to certain restrictions
- 2 How to balance the competing public interests of open justice, investigative confidentiality, and privilege against self-incrimination
Ratio Decidendi
Access to parts of the requested affidavits should be granted to the applicant, subject to masking of certain names and exclusion of exhibits and annexures, as this properly balances the competing public interests involved.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Ms Carson be granted access to the affidavit of Leonard Gordon Foscholo sworn 10 August 2004 with names of potential witnesses masked and exhibits excluded.
- Ms Carson be granted access to the affidavit of Bruce Vernon Dennis sworn 7 September 2004 excluding its annexures.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment