Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Green Pacific Energy Limited ACN 004 119 304 [2007] FCA 1015

Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Green Pacific Energy Limited ACN 004 119 304 [2007] FCA 1015

It was appropriate to grant the orders sought, as the liquidator's proposal was in the interests of creditors and consultations had already taken place, making the first meeting unnecessary. Leave was granted under s 436B(2) for the liquidator and his partner to act as administrators, and orders were made under s 447A to vary the operation of provisions regarding meetings of creditors. Liquidator's costs were allowed as an expense in the liquidation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application/interlocutory Process / Interlocutory Orders Appointment of Administrators
Outcome
Interlocutory orders made granting leave and varying operation of the Act as specified.
Legal Topics
['appointment of Administrators' 'deed of Company Arrangement' 'meetings of Creditors' "liquidator's Powers"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Application/interlocutory Process / Interlocutory Orders Appointment of Administrators

  1. 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for the liquidator to appoint himself and a partner as administrators under s 436B(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether to dispense with the first meeting of creditors under s 436E' 'Whether to alter operation of s 439A(2) regarding convening the second creditors meeting' "Whether liquidator's costs should be expenses of the liquidation"]

Ratio Decidendi

It was appropriate to grant the orders sought, as the liquidator's proposal was in the interests of creditors and consultations had already taken place, making the first meeting unnecessary. Leave was granted under s 436B(2) for the liquidator and his partner to act as administrators, and orders were made under s 447A to vary the operation of provisions regarding meetings of creditors. Liquidator's costs were allowed as an expense in the liquidation.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders made granting leave and varying operation of the Act as specified.

Orders

  • ['Leave for liquidator and partner to appoint themselves as administrators under s 436B(2) to First and Second Defendant.' 'Dispensation of first meeting of creditors under s 436E.' 'Administrators may convene meeting under s 439A during convening period subject to s 439A(3) notice.' "Liquidator's costs of the...