Australian Securities & Investments Commission v Green Pacific Energy Limited ACN 004 119 304 [2007] FCA 1015
It was appropriate to grant the orders sought, as the liquidator's proposal was in the interests of creditors and consultations had already taken place, making the first meeting unnecessary. Leave was granted under s 436B(2) for the liquidator and his partner to act as administrators, and orders were made under s 447A to vary the operation of provisions regarding meetings of creditors. Liquidator's costs were allowed as an expense in the liquidation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application/interlocutory Process / Interlocutory Orders Appointment of Administrators
- Outcome
- Interlocutory orders made granting leave and varying operation of the Act as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['appointment of Administrators' 'deed of Company Arrangement' 'meetings of Creditors' "liquidator's Powers"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application/interlocutory Process / Interlocutory Orders Appointment of Administrators
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for the liquidator to appoint himself and a partner as administrators under s 436B(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)' 'Whether to dispense with the first meeting of creditors under s 436E' 'Whether to alter operation of s 439A(2) regarding convening the second creditors meeting' "Whether liquidator's costs should be expenses of the liquidation"]
Ratio Decidendi
It was appropriate to grant the orders sought, as the liquidator's proposal was in the interests of creditors and consultations had already taken place, making the first meeting unnecessary. Leave was granted under s 436B(2) for the liquidator and his partner to act as administrators, and orders were made under s 447A to vary the operation of provisions regarding meetings of creditors. Liquidator's costs were allowed as an expense in the liquidation.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory orders made granting leave and varying operation of the Act as specified.
Orders
- ['Leave for liquidator and partner to appoint themselves as administrators under s 436B(2) to First and Second Defendant.' 'Dispensation of first meeting of creditors under s 436E.' 'Administrators may convene meeting under s 439A during convening period subject to s 439A(3) notice.' "Liquidator's costs of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment