In the matter of Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd - Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hobbs [2013] NSWSC 106
Permanent disqualification orders from management of corporations and financial services, and substantial pecuniary penalties, are warranted against first, third, fourth, and eighth defendants for serious and sustained contraventions of the Corporations Act and ASIC Act in operating unregistered managed investment schemes, providing financial services without a licence, making misrepresentations, and improper use of position to benefit themselves to the detriment of their companies and investors. The 'Adler' factors and public protection and deterrence were applied. Coercive and protective orders, including asset receivership, are justified given the scale and dishonest nature of the...
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Australian Securities and Investments Commission; First Defendant: David John Hobbs; Second Defendant: Min Hua Li; Third Defendant: David John Collard; Fourth Defendant: Huimin Wu; Fifth Defendant: Con Koutsoukos; Sixth Defendant: Brian John Wood; Seventh Defendant: Jimmy Truong; Eighth Defendant: Jacqueline Hobbs; Ninth Defendant: Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 121 960 754; Tenth Defendant: 888 Management Inc; Eleventh Defendant: Geneva Financial Ltd; Twelfth Defendant: Barclaywest Ltd; Thirteenth Defendant: Preserved Investment Group Ltd; Fourteenth Defendant: North Wave Ltd; Fifteenth Defendant: G P Global Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalty Proceedings / Consequential Orders / Penalty Determination and Consequential Orders After Liability Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations, penalty and disqualification orders made; costs awarded as specified; orders for winding up schemes and appointment of liquidator and receiver; permanent or lengthy disqualification and restraint orders against four individual defendants; pecuniary penalties imposed as specified; other consequential...
- Legal Topics
- Civil Penalties, Disqualification Orders, Unregistered Managed Investment Schemes, Unlicensed Financial Services, Director's Duties, Misrepresentations, Asset Freezing and Receivership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Plaintiff
David John Hobbs
First Defendant
Min Hua Li
Second Defendant
David John Collard
Third Defendant
Huimin Wu
Fourth Defendant
Con Koutsoukos
Fifth Defendant
Brian John Wood
Sixth Defendant
Jimmy Truong
Seventh Defendant
Jacqueline Hobbs
Eighth Defendant
Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd ACN 121 960 754
Ninth Defendant
888 Management Inc
Tenth Defendant
Geneva Financial Ltd
Eleventh Defendant
Barclaywest Ltd
Twelfth Defendant
Preserved Investment Group Ltd
Thirteenth Defendant
North Wave Ltd
Fourteenth Defendant
G P Global Ltd
Fifteenth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceedings / Consequential Orders / Penalty Determination and Consequential Orders After Liability Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether disqualification orders and pecuniary penalties should be imposed on individual defendants for multiple contraventions of the Corporations Act and ASIC Act in relation to operation of unregistered managed investment schemes and the provision of unlicensed financial services;
- 2 Appropriate periods and scope for disqualification and financial services restraint orders;
- 3 Appropriate quantum of pecuniary penalties;
Ratio Decidendi
Permanent disqualification orders from management of corporations and financial services, and substantial pecuniary penalties, are warranted against first, third, fourth, and eighth defendants for serious and sustained contraventions of the Corporations Act and ASIC Act in operating unregistered managed investment schemes, providing financial services without a licence, making misrepresentations, and improper use of position to benefit themselves to the detriment of their companies and investors. The 'Adler' factors and public protection and deterrence were applied. Coercive and protective orders, including asset receivership, are justified given the scale and dishonest nature of the...
Court Disposition
Declarations, penalty and disqualification orders made; costs awarded as specified; orders for winding up schemes and appointment of liquidator and receiver; permanent or lengthy disqualification and restraint orders against four individual defendants; pecuniary penalties imposed as specified; other consequential...
Orders
- First defendant (Hobbs): Permanent disqualification from managing corporations; permanently restrained from operating/promoting managed investment schemes or providing financial services without AFSL; ordered to pay pecuniary penalty of $500,000.
- Third defendant (Collard): Disqualified from managing corporations for 20 years; permanently restrained from relevant conduct; ordered to pay pecuniary penalty of $150,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment