ASIC v Rich & Ors [2004] NSWSC 836
The third defendant contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Law by failing, as non-executive chairman, to take reasonable steps to ensure material financial information was provided to the Board, monitor management, and recommend appropriate action. The evidence and the defendant's admissions established breaches, justifying declarations under s 1317E, a compensation order of $20 million, and a disqualification for four years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Application for Declarations, Disqualification, Compensation and Costs (consent Orders)
- Outcome
- Declarations of contravention made; compensation and disqualification orders granted by consent; costs ordered; terms of some declarations stood over for possible revision.
- Legal Topics
- ["director's Duties" 'duty of Care and Diligence' 'disqualification of Directors' 'compensation Orders' 'declarations of Contravention']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Application for Declarations, Disqualification, Compensation and Costs (consent Orders)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the third defendant, as non-executive chairman, contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Law by failing to exercise reasonable care and diligence.' 'Appropriate specificity of declarations under s 1317E and the operation of s 1317F of the Corporations Act.' 'Whether the orders for disqualification and compensation by consent are appropriate in the circumstances.']
Ratio Decidendi
The third defendant contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Law by failing, as non-executive chairman, to take reasonable steps to ensure material financial information was provided to the Board, monitor management, and recommend appropriate action. The evidence and the defendant's admissions established breaches, justifying declarations under s 1317E, a compensation order of $20 million, and a disqualification for four years.
Court Disposition
Declarations of contravention made; compensation and disqualification orders granted by consent; costs ordered; terms of some declarations stood over for possible revision.
Orders
- ['Declarations made in accordance with paragraphs 1(d), 2, 3 and 4 and orders in paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 of Schedule B to the Enforceable Undertaking.' 'Disqualification of the third defendant from managing corporations for four years.' 'Compensation order that the third defendant pay $20 million to One.Tel Limited...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment