Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MobiSuper Pty Ltd [2021] FCA 855
Tidswell contravened s 912A(1)(a) of the Corporations Act by not taking steps necessary to ensure the provision of financial services (issuance of interests in the MobiSuper Fund) was carried out efficiently, honestly and fairly. This included failing to monitor or supervise the fund promoter’s marketing and customer engagement activities, failing to review call scripts and training, and not mitigating specific identified risks to consumers. Tidswell also failed to comply with r 30 of APRA Prudential Standard SPS 231 by not maintaining sufficient resources and processes to manage and monitor the outsourcing relationship with Mobi.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Regulatory/corporations Proceeding / Consent Judgment/partial Settlement for Third Defendant, Interlocutory as to Other Defendants
- Outcome
- Declaration of contravention made against third defendant (Tidswell); proceedings otherwise dismissed as to Tidswell by consent; costs and other orders. Proceedings as to other defendants ongoing.
- Legal Topics
- ['financial Services Licensing' 'superannuation Trustee Obligations' 'outsourcing by Superannuation Trustees' 'declarations in Regulatory Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Regulatory/corporations Proceeding / Consent Judgment/partial Settlement for Third Defendant, Interlocutory as to Other Defendants
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether third defendant (Tidswell Financial Services Ltd) contravened s 912A(1)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by failing to do all things necessary to ensure relevant financial services were provided efficiently, honestly and fairly' 'Whether Tidswell failed to comply with paragraph 30 of APRA Prudential Standard SPS 231 Outsourcing']
Ratio Decidendi
Tidswell contravened s 912A(1)(a) of the Corporations Act by not taking steps necessary to ensure the provision of financial services (issuance of interests in the MobiSuper Fund) was carried out efficiently, honestly and fairly. This included failing to monitor or supervise the fund promoter’s marketing and customer engagement activities, failing to review call scripts and training, and not mitigating specific identified risks to consumers. Tidswell also failed to comply with r 30 of APRA Prudential Standard SPS 231 by not maintaining sufficient resources and processes to manage and monitor the outsourcing relationship with Mobi.
Court Disposition
Declaration of contravention made against third defendant (Tidswell); proceedings otherwise dismissed as to Tidswell by consent; costs and other orders. Proceedings as to other defendants ongoing.
Orders
- ['Declaration that Tidswell contravened s 912A(1)(a) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and paragraph 30 of APRA Prudential Standard SPS 231 Outsourcing' 'Tidswell to pay ASIC’s costs as against it fixed at $50,000' 'Tidswell to bear its own costs' 'Tidswell undertakes not to pay ASIC’s costs out of trust funds held for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment